Get best of the week

Best Russian IT employers 2019: annual Habr Career rating



For Habr Career, in 2019, almost nine thousand employees rated more than 1.5 thousand organizations. Of these, we left 190 - only those that received ratings from 10 or more employees. 15 companies of different sizes reached the final: from giants with a staff of thousands of people to start-ups, where everyone knows each other by sight. Whatever the company, it turned out that most of all people appreciate interesting tasks, modern technologies and the opportunity to grow professionally.

The employer assessment service for Habr Career was launched in mid-2018. With it, employees anonymously evaluate their employers, and anyone can see the ratings. Based on these data, we annually compile an employer rating, and today we are pleased to present the best employers in IT 2019. Half of these companies participated in the 2018 employer rating . Compare, this is interesting.


Companies compete in four weight categories:

1. Huge companies

  • Companies of more than 5,000 employees;
  • The median (“normal”) score is 3.9;
  • Assessment received 28 companies ( their rating on Habr Career).

2. Large companies

  • From 1,000 to 5,000 employees
  • The median score is 4.3;
  • Evaluation received 34 companies ( their rating ).

3. Medium-sized companies

  • From 100 to 1,000 employees;
  • The median score is 4.4;
  • Evaluation received 56 companies ( their rating ).

4. Small companies

  • From 10 to 100 employees;
  • The median score is 4.7;
  • Evaluation received 70 companies ( their rating ).

And here are the companies that entered the top 3 for each category:




Next, let's take a closer look at each company that made it into the top 3 best IT employers. We list exactly what qualities of the company put it in the top 3, if you compare it with other companies of the same weight category for this particular quality. We will also give a link to a page with a detailed assessment of the company on Habr Career: there you can see how many employees gave their assessment, how they rated all 12 qualities, as well as read their reviews about the advantages and disadvantages of the employer.

Huge companies


  • 5 000 ;
  • — 3,9 5;
  • 28 ( ).

image () — .

→ 		4,591.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11. -
12.

image — IT-.

→ 		4,341.
2.
3.
4.
5. -

imageLuxoft — IT-, .

→

4,261.
2.
3.




  • 1 000 5 000 ;
  • — 4,3 5;
  • 34 ( ).

imageAndersen — , .

→ 		4,81.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10. -
11.

imageRevolut — .

→

4,691.
2.
3.
5.

image Hemmersbach — IT-.

→ 		4,681.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6. -

image — IT-.

→ 		4,681.
2.
3.
4.
5. -




  • 100 1 000 ;
  • — 4,4 5;
  • 56 ( ).

image — .

→
4,861.
2.
3.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9. -

imageSolit Clouds — .

→ 		4,831.
2.
3.
4.
5. -
6.

imageWrike — .

→ 		4,791.
2.
3.
4.
5.

imageHaulmont — .

→

4,791.




  • 10 100;
  • — 4,7 5;
  • 70 ( ).

imageEnapter — , , .

→ 		4,991.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10. -
11.

imageAcryl Platform — .

→ 		4,981.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9. -

imageMobileUp — . .

→ 		4,971.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10. -
11.

imageMetacommerce — .

→ 		4,971.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10. -
11.




Employees rate their employers by 12 qualities. For each quality, the employee gives a rating from 1 (completely disagree) to 5 (completely agree). Based on individual ratings, a weighted average of each quality is calculated. And from these 12 ratings, the arithmetic average estimate is calculated, which becomes the general estimate of the company that we use to build the rating.
An example of calculating the average company score based on ratings for each quality:
(4.63 + 4.72 + 4.31 + 4.7 + 4.67 + 4.69 + 4.6 + 4.64 + 4.55 + 4 , 4 + 4.54 + 4.65) / 12 = 4.59.

Read more about the grading system and calculation rules.



Companies compete in separate weight categories, depending on the number of employees, because we unequivocally revealed the pattern: the larger the company, the lower its average rating for any of the 12 qualities, and the lower its overall average rating. 




P.S


Some companies receive high marks for individual qualities, but at the same time, according to the overall average rating, they are not in the top. Therefore, a little later we will release a separate rating, in which employers will compete for each individual quality, leading them to the top 3 in this quality.

We also try to build a separate rating of food and outsourcing companies, and a rating of companies in individual industries.

We hope our ratings help employers and job seekers find each other more accurately and meet mutual expectations. We will be glad if this rating inspires you to evaluate your employers at Habr Career.

More articles:


All Articles